Ten SDL representatives have just walked straight through Pollokshields with our SDL hoodies on and a SDL flag, we walked to the Kriss Donald
memorial plaque and laid our flowers and paid our respects we came under attack from the local Muslim community but stood our ground until the police dispersed everyone, we go where we want in our own country and will never surrender to the violent racist Muslim community in Pollokshields. R I P Kriss Donald, we will never forget you x S S SDL
Oh dear this Communist thinks that Casuals United have made the police our own private “stormtroopers” LOL When our representatives contacted Kent Police they were told they had been snowed under with complaints. Oh, and keep saying “fascist” and “neo-fascist” and “hooligans” and somebody might believe you. We are peaceful protesters and we get results. Deal with it.
Suzy
Use the link below to make Freedom of Information requests of any authority you want. Ask the CPS how many non whites they have charged with racism, how much they spent on interpreters, how many white people have been charged with hate speech etc ask Border Agency how much they spent on interpreters, how many illegal immigrants they have arrested/deported etc. Ask hospitals how much interpreters cost, how many foreign nationals they have treated etc. The world is literally your omlette here. Try and make requests unique, or you will get a stock response. Ask to see documents relating to their finances. The harder it is to get the info for you the more money it will cost them and the more time consuming it will be. Fill your boots. Its piss easy to register and its easy as sending an email. Just search for the agency you want and get requesting. The true picture of how much immigration is costing this country becomes apparent when you look through the existing answers.
Get on it people
Zoe
September 1st Scottish Defence League demo Dundee
September 1st English Defence League demo Walthamstow (London)
September 22nd Casuals United demo Rochdale
Despite dozens of us emailing the Met police and emailing ALL the national papers and the BBC we have had no response. This goes to illustrate perfectly what we are saying, that “anti-racism” laws in this country actually mean “laws to silence white people”. When Emma West had a mild racist outburst on a tram the Media and the Commies were howling for her blood. The police scrambled to find and arrest her. She was remanded in custody for F@@ks sake! You could not make this up. Yet when a black woman does the same, and her outburst is more violent and directly hateful towards white people, the Media are silent and the police are (so far) ignoring our complaints. Black people being racist doesnt fit in with the image we are all being fed of a multiracial land where everyone gets on, and the only people spoiling that are those nasty racist whites. Youtube keep pulling the video down as “hate crime” yet the Emma West video is still there.
Watch it here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Be-x-NgyILY
We will keep chasing the police and keep you posted here.
Zoe
This black racist Lee Jasper who is paid by our Government to advise on “race issues” says black people cant be racist. Arseholes like this are “advising” our corrupt, politically correct MPs. You could not make this shit up.
PUBLISHED: 22:13, 18 August 2012 | UPDATED: 22:19, 18 August 2012
Campaigner: Nadira Naipaul, pictured, has witnessed first-hand the torture inflicted on women in Pakistan
When I married V. S. Naipaul and moved to England in 1996, I thought I had left the horror behind.
Pakistan had drained my resolve, and I was tired of fighting a losing battle. To me, England, for all its ills, was the promised land.
Instead, I have found the horror I fled has followed me here. It is all around, eroding the very core of everything Britain believes in.
I see it everywhere. In the haunted eyes of young Pakistani girls, brought up in Britain, who know nothing but a Westernised life: young women who work happily behind beauty counters in our department stores, yet must return home to parents who refuse to emerge from their cultural ghettos.
And who expect their daughters to accept traditional arranged marriages to distant cousins brought up in rural Pakistan.
Desperate to integrate, these young girls change their names to sound more British. They are happy to have white boyfriends, to go clubbing. They certainly do not want forced marriages.
When I talk to them they are seething with anger that their parents – some semi-literate – insist upon entrenching themselves in Muslim ghettos, erecting cultural barriers and refusing to integrate, rejecting any semblance of a British way of life.
I see the same anger in young Muslim men who desperately want to join the mainstream, but cannot because deeply traditional parents expect strict adherence to traditional Islamic family life. It is easy to see how the clash between the generations can become corrosive, how at its most destructive extreme it can culminate in ‘honour killings’.
Take the recent case in Warrington of Iftikhar and Farzana Ahmed, who murdered their Westernised daughter Shafilea, 17, because she refused to accept a forced marriage.
Honour killing: Iftikhar Ahmed, 52, and his wife Farzana, 49, of Warrington, Cheshire, suffocated their 17-year-old daughter Shafilea with a plastic bag because she refused an arranged marriage
Inside the courtroom: Iftikhar Ahmed stood impassively as the verdicts were given while his spouse wiped tears from her eyes with a tissue
At a previous hearing: Iftikhar and Farzana Ahmed were two traditionalist disciplinarians who had very fixed ideas about how their children, particularly their daughters, should behave
For a decade, while in Pakistan, I wrote extensively about women enmeshed in the restrictions of Islamic law and traditions of honour. Witnessing the torture inflicted on women by husbands, fathers, brothers and even female relatives with the seeming sanction of Islam gradually transformed me into a borderline heretic. It took me years to realise how deeply ingrained these beliefs are. And how difficult it is to combat them.
The tales of two women affected me deeply. While living on my farm in rural Bahawalpur with my first husband, I met Rani, a young woman whose husband was one of my seasonal labourers. I employed her as a maid.
A few months later, we were visited by a minister in the government who was one of the biggest landowners in the area and an old friend of my husband. He arrived with an entourage demanding that I hand over Rani, her husband and her five-year-old son.
Missing: Shafilea Ahmed disappeared in September 2003 and her body was found on the bank of the River Kent in Cumbria the following February
Rani had been a beautiful child. At the age of ten, her parents, tenants of the minister’s grandfather, ‘gave’ her to the old man. She was regularly sexually abused by the minister, his father and grandfather. The women of the house did not protest, provided the men were discreet.
But when Rani became pregnant they married her off to an old man who often beat her and her son.
A few years later Rani fell in love with a local boy and eloped with him and the child. Now the minister wanted her back.
What, I asked my husband, would happen if we handed her over? He told me they would strip her, tie her to a carriage wheel, flog her, then rape her. She would be defiled in public.
He insisted, however, that we must hand her over. Not to do so would offend an old family friend. If not chastised properly, it would encourage other women to question their lot.
My husband had been educated in England and was the scion of an old, respected family, yet he accepted such things. When he realised I wouldn’t give Rani up, the minister said his ‘face must be saved’. He insisted upon taking the boy. Rani wailed like a banshee. The heartrending sight and sound of her has never left me.
On another occasion, a young woman was doused in petrol and set alight by her father and brother in front of her terrified mother and sisters because she would not marry a man who had abducted her. The family considered her defiled. She had stayed overnight with this man. She must marry him or they would be shamed. When she tried to run away, they murdered her.
These are extreme examples, but stark reminders of the hold these beliefs have on entrenched communities – communities that have, for five decades, been relocating to Britain.
So why, then, have successive Governments refused to acknowledge the incestuous cultures that have evolved in these ghettos? Why does no one challenge the existence of the so-called ‘Islamic Parliaments’, with their retrogressive laws, that exist in cities such as Bradford and Leicester?
Time for change: Nadira Naipaul believes Muslim women, pictured here outside Bangor Street Community Centre in Blackburn, England, should not be forced to wear veils
In these cities, teams of vigilantes terrorise Pakistani communities. They turn up unannounced to homes, insisting that Ramadan is respected and checking that everyone has come to prayers. They force shops to close, they check that the community is fasting, that women wear the veil.
Let me be clear. No Muslim woman should be forced to wear a veil. No woman wore it in the era of the Prophet. These Muslims may see themselves as community champions, but they are fanatics who make life a misery for young people who want to integrate.
It is time for liberal Muslims to speak out. The defenders of our precious multiculturalism must get real. My message to those who promote these entrenched ghetto ideas is this: go home if you want to practise your form of Islam. There is no place for it here.
Friday 17th Aug AL Quds March London no groups just a day out shopping
Saturday 18th August EDL Chelmsford
Saturday 18th August Northern flash details by text
Saturday Sept 1st EDL Waltamstow
Saturday Sept 1st SDL Dundee
Saturday Sept 6th Sheffield details by text
Saturday Sept 22nd Casuals United Rochdale
Just like all the other Commie mofos in this pic, Norwegian twat Breivik pulls a Communist salute in court, he just couldnt help himself. This guys whole game has been to try and discredit right wing movements all across Europe. if this moron is a “patriot” Ill eat my hat. His agenda is left wing, his whole plan was to bring down harassment and discredit on anti Jihad groups. If this guy really was a right wing, anti Muslim extremist why did he not attack any Muslims? Hes a Commie, I guarantee it. Time will tell. False flags all around.
Becki NFSE
A Conservative MP was sent a threatening email telling her she would have to choose which one of her children would die, a court has heard.
Mother-of-three Louise Mensch, who is MP for Corby in Northamptonshire, was told she faced a “Sophie’s Choice” – a reference to a novel and later film in which heroine Sophie has to choose between the life of her son or daughter at a Nazi concentration camp.
The sinister email was purportedly sent from the online hacking group Anonymous, Gloucester Magistrates’ Court heard.
However, police later arrested and charged Frank Zimmerman – a 60-year-old agoraphobic living in a run-down house in Gloucester.
Zimmerman, of Spinney Road, Barnwood, Gloucester, was accused of an offence of sending by public communication network an offensive, indecent, obscene, menacing message or matter on 22 August last year.
The court heard that Zimmerman had failed to attend any court appearance to answer the single charge he faced or give proper instructions to his solicitor – blaming his agoraphobia and depression.
Defence solicitor Charles Cronin told District Judge Martin Brown that he had spoken to Zimmerman by telephone and that he would not be attending court and was instead going back to bed.
In the defendant’s absence, Judge Brown decided to proceed without him and held a hearing to determine whether Zimmerman had committed the offence.
Prosecutor Gaon Hart told the court that that Zimmerman had sent the email to Mrs Mensch after she had spoken out publicly during last summer’s riots calling for the police to be able to temporarily close down social network sites, such as Twitter and Facebook, if necessary.
Zimmerman originally made contact with the chick lit author-turned-MP on Twitter using the pseudonym Tim Cavendish.
He claimed he had information about Piers Morgan and the telephone hacking scandal engulfing the News of the World.
Mrs Mensch sent him her personal gmail email address. It was to that account that Zimmerman sent the threatening message, the court heard.
The email, which was timed at 10.47pm on 22 August, was sent from an account with the address of lulz.sec@hotmail.com – a reference to the internet hacking group Lulz Security.
The email said:
“Subject: You have been HACKED
Louise Mensch, nee Bagshawe, the slut of Twitter.
We are Anonymous and we don’t like rude c**** like you and your nouveau riche husband Peter Mensch. You have been hacked!
We are inside your computer and all your phones, everywhere… and inside your homes.
So get off Twitter.
We see you are still on Twitter. We have sent a camera crew to photograph you and your kids and will post it all over the net, including Twitter. C***face.
You now have a Sophie’s Choice. Which kid is to go? One will, count on it c***.
Have a nice day
From all of us at MIT 617-253-1000″
Mr Hart said the reference to MIT followed by a US telephone number was to give the impression the email had been sent from hackers linked to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Mrs Mensch was in New York with her husband recovering from an operation while her three children were with their father, her ex-husband, in the UK.
The MP took the threats seriously and immediately contacted the police, the court was told.
In a victim impact statement read to the court, Mrs Mensch spoke of her terror at receiving the threat.
“I was terrified on behalf of my children. I was in New York with my husband recovering from an operation and my children were with their father and to receive a threat like this made me very upset,” she said.
“I was 3,000 miles away from my children and I was worried for their safety and the safety of my ex-husband. I felt powerless to do anything.”
Mrs Mensch said that after receiving the email she was sent a Twitter message from someone called “Robert Redford”.
“He made reference to the contents of the email and that one of my children would die and it made me believe he was responsible,” she said.
Zimmerman first became a suspect for threatening Mrs Mensch when Independent newspaper columnist Terence Blacker, who was a former neighbour of the defendant in London, received a similar email.
A forensic examination linked the sender of the email to the IP and router addresses of Zimmerman’s Virgin Media account at his home in Gloucester.
Police visited his house and he volunteered the password for his computer, the court was told.
Examination of that computer found Zimmerman had a series of tabs on his internet browser open at the Twitter accounts of Tim Cavendish, Mrs Mensch, Piers Morgan and Lord Prescott.
He also had pages open on BBC News Online of reports of Mrs Mensch receiving threats to her children by email, an article on the News of the World hacking scandal and a story on the hacking group Anonymous.
There was also a page open for a Skype account in the name of Tim Cavendish.
Detective Constable Iqbal Azad told the court: “We were able to trace the internet service provider and it was an internet broadband account held by Mr Frank Zimmerman at his home address.”
Judge Brown said he had to rule on whether the email sent to Mrs Mensch was malicious, and if it was, had Zimmerman sent it.
He said he was satisfied the email was malicious and added: “The court needs to be satisfied that this email can be linked to the defendant.
“The very helpful evidence of Det Con Azad has been clear that there is a direct link to the IP address that has been identified as coming from Mr Zimmerman’s computer.
“It does not appear in question in my mind that the prosecution have established a direct link by the email received by Louise Mensch and the computer that was found at the defendant’s address.
“I can be satisfied that this was a malicious communication sent by Mr Zimmerman from his computer at his home address.
“I can therefore be satisfied that he committed the act in question and the offence has been committed.”
The judge said he had decided not to issue an immediate warrant for Zimmerman’s arrest without bail and was releasing him on unconditional bail until he is sentenced on 8 May.
He told Mr Hart: “If he does not attend on that date, and unless circumstances change, he must understand I am being left with very little alternative but to issue a warrant.”
Following the judge’s ruling, Mr Hart said the Crown would be applying at the sentencing hearing for a restraining order against Zimmerman, preventing him contacting “other high-profile individuals”.
Details of the proposed order were not revealed in court.
Speaking afterwards, Mr Hart, who is part of the Crown Prosecution Service’s special crime and counter-terrorism division, said: “The right to freedom of speech is accompanied by laws that protect individuals from those who seek to abuse that freedom and use the anonymity of email or Twitter accounts to hide from the fear that they cause.
“Zimmerman attempted to use pseudonyms and other methods to wage a campaign of fear against a high-profile person, thinking that he was safe from detection.
“He was wrong. This should be a salutary lesson for anyone who considers that they are above the law because they threaten others through a computer rather than on the streets.
“I would also like to thank officers from the Metropolitan Police Central e-crime unit for their hard work.”
Last updated at 2:49 PM on 12th February 2012
Hate preacher Abu Qatada will receive round-the-clock police protection costing £10,000 a week after he is released from prison tomorrow.
Officers will guard Qatada’s West London home where a panic alarm has been installed over fears he and his family may be attacked by vigilante mobs.
The Police have a ‘duty of care’ to protect him , his wife and five children and have drawn up plans to move them to a safe-house in the event of an emergency.
On the loose: Qatada will be under curfew for 22-hours-a-day but will be free to take his children to and from school
He will be under a 22-hour-a-day curfew, with two hours provided to take his children to and from school, following his release from Long Lartin jail, Worcs.
Security Minister James Brokenshire is scheduled to fly to Jordan this week in the hope Qatada can be deported there to face charges of terrorism.
Police have a ‘duty of care’ to protect Qatada and his family
Prime Minister David Cameron is also due to speak to King Abdullah of Jordan about the matter.
Earlier efforts to deport Qatada to Jordan where he is wanted over his alleged involvement in bomb plots, failed after the European Court of Human rights judged the evidence against him to have been obtained by torture.
If next week’s negotiations fail Qatada will continue to be monitored under the new Terrorism Prevention Measures for two years, but after that point he will be totally free.
One of the terms of his release is that he will only be able to meet visitors who have been vetted.
However the restrictions do not apply to his children, one of which – 18-year-old Qatada Othman – appears to be following in his father’s footsteps after it emerged he delivered an anti-British sermon outside Belmarsh prison in August last year.
Qatada Othman accused the government of ‘waging war’ against Muslims as he shared a platform with convicted terrorists.
The youngster, who arrived in the UK with his father as a two-month-old baby, was speaking at the event organised by former members of the now-banned group Al-Muhajiroun.
During his sermon he praised the ‘places of jihad’ that have stood up to western ‘colonisation’ and praised terror suspects Abu Hamza and Haroon Aswat.
Release: Qatada is due to walk free from Long Lartin jail, Worcs., on Monday
Qatada senior was originally convicted (in his absence) of a series of crimes in Jordan whilst living in the UK on state benefits said to total £1,000 a month – including £70 a week for a bad back.
These included terror attacks in 1998, and plotting to plant bombs in what would have been a terrorist ‘spectacular’ to mark the Millennium.
He called on British Muslims to martyr themselves in a holy war, and was arrested by anti-terrorism police in February 2001 in connection with plans by a cell in Frankfurt to bomb the Strasbourg Christmas market.
Battle: The Daily Mail’s front page from January 27, 2005
He was found to have £170,000 cash in his possession, including £805 in an envelope marked ‘For the mujahedin in Chechnya’.
No charges were brought because of insufficient evidence, and he was allowed to remain at large. In the panic after the 9/11 attacks, the authorities finally decided Qatada and other extremists should be removed from the streets.
Controversial laws were passed allowing for their detention without trial.
But, on the eve of the legislation coming into force in December 2001, Qatada went on the run. He was one of Britain’s most wanted men, but avoided capture for ten months.
Qatada, whose real name is Omar Mahmoud Mohammed Othman, was finally arrested in an armed raid on a council house in South London in 2002 and held in Belmarsh Prison at a cost of £50,000-a-year.
The most serious offence he can now be charged with in the UK is inciting murder which carries a prison sentence of only seven years.
But because he has already spent nine years awaiting deportation within the UK, even if he were to be found guilty he would automatically be released.
By TIM SHIPMAN, DEPUTY POLITICAL EDITOR
Last updated at 8:40 AM on 10th February 2012
Release: MPs are demanding the UK ignores the European Court Of Human rights and deports Abu Qatada immediately
Tory MPs last night called for Abu Qatada to be deported without delay amid fears that the hate preacher could stay in Britain for years.
Senior backbenchers demanded that the UK ignore rulings from the European Court of Human Rights and send him to Jordan to face terror charges.
David Cameron won backing from King Abdullah of Jordan last night to thrash out a deal over Qatada’s future.
A Downing Street spokesman said ‘the Prime Minister explained the frustrating and difficult position that the ruling had created for the UK’.
The spokesman added: ‘They agreed on the importance of finding an effective solution to this case, in the interests of both Britain and Jordan.’
Bethlehem-born Qatada has been in a high-security prison in the UK for more than six years fighting deportation and has cost taxpayers more than £1million in benefits.
But an immigration judge ruled earlier this week that he should be released on bail, meaning the fanatic, once described as Osama Bin Laden’s ambassador in Europe, could be walking Britain’s streets as early as Monday.
Home Office Minister James Brokenshire is due to fly to Jordan next week to secure a pledge that Qatada would not be tried there using evidence obtained under torture – the major concern of the European human rights judges.
Government lawyers still believe that ignoring the ECHR’s ruling on Qatada would lead to an immediate injunction by his lawyers and the ensuing legal action could take years.
‘Put him on a plane’: Priti Patel
But Conservatives made it clear they want action now.
Priti Patel said: ‘We should put him on a plane. He is a highly dangerous individual and it is totally incomprehensible that he would be given his freedom.
‘It’s all very well trying to do deals to satisfy the lawyers but at the end of the day the British public want to see action.’
Her fellow Tory MP Dominic Raab said: ‘It makes sense to try to extend the reassurances with the Jordanians. But the bottom line is that Abu Qatada needs to end up on a flight back to [Jordan’s capital] Amman.’
A third Tory, Peter Bone, said: ‘What we have to do is put him on a plane and worry about the consequences later. It is an issue of British national security.
The lives of British men, women and children must come first.’
Mr Bone argued that other EU countries have previously ignored rulings by the ECHR and have merely received a reprimand and a fine.
‘We should pay no attention to this European court,’ he said. ‘In fact, we should put two fingers up to them. They have no powers to enforce their rulings anyway.’
Usman Khan, Mohammed Shahjahan and Nazam Hussain were described as Islamic fundamentalistsNine men who plotted to bomb the London Stock Exchange and build a terrorist training camp have been jailed.
Three of the men – all members of an al-Qaeda inspired terror group – received indeterminate sentences for public protection at London’s Woolwich Crown Court.
The court heard they had planned to raise funds for a terrorist camp in Pakistan and recruit Britons to attend.
The nine come from Stoke-on-Trent, Cardiff and London.
In sentencing, the judge described all the men – who are British nationals of Bangladeshi and Pakistani origin – as Islamic fundamentalists.
The three to receive indeterminate sentences for the terror camp plan included Mohammed Shahjahan 27, of Stoke-on-Trent, who was jailed for a minimum term of eight years and 10 months.
Usman Khan, 20, and Nazam Hussain, 26, also from Stoke-on-Trent, were ordered to serve at least eight years.
Judge Mr Justice Wilkie said these three were “the more serious jihadists” and said they should not be released until they were no longer a threat to the public.
The court heard they planned to establish the terrorist camp on land in Pakistan-controlled Kashmir owned by Khan’s family and encourage a “significant” number of British Muslims to undergo training there.
Khan and Hussain planned to travel to the camp and receive military instruction themselves before “obtaining first-hand terrorist experience in Kashmir”, the hearing was told.
Passing sentence, Mr Justice Wilkie said this was a “serious, long-term venture in terrorism” that could also have resulted in atrocities in the UK.
The police kept the men under surveillance for some time before arresting them“It was envisaged by them all that ultimately they and the other recruits may return to the UK as trained and experienced terrorists available to perform terrorist attacks in this country, on one possibility contemplated in the context of the return of British troops from Afghanistan.”
Four others, who all pleaded guilty to engaging in conduct in preparation for acts of terrorism by planning to plant a bomb in the toilets of the London Stock Exchange, were:
Omar Latif, 28, from Cardiff, admitted attending meetings with the intention of assisting others to prepare or commit acts of terrorism. He was given a sentence of 10 years and 4 months.
Mohibur Rahman, 28, from London, was given a five-year sentence after he admitted to possessing two editions of an al-Qaeda magazine for terrorist purposes.
These nine men were not members of al-Qaeda but they were clearly influenced by the message of that organisation”
Piers Arnold, CPS
All nine men were arrested in December 2010. Each pleaded guilty to terrorism charges on the eve of their trial at Woolwich Crown Court.
Andrew Edis QC, prosecuting, said between them the nine men possessed “almost every famous jihadi publication” including copies of an online al-Qaeda magazine called Inspire which carries features such as how to “Make a bomb in the kitchen of your mom”.
He told the court the nine had decided to form a group in October 2010 to “support and commit acts of terrorism in furtherance of their religious belief”.
Piers Arnold, a lawyer for the Crown Prosecution Service, said the men were motivated by extreme Jihadist propaganda circulated on the internet by organisations like al-Qaeda.
“These nine men were not members of al-Qaeda but they were clearly influenced by the message of that organisation and in particular by the teachings of the American-born ideologue, Anwar Al-Awlaki, who died in a drone attack in Yemen last year.”
He said Al-Awlaki was a key contributor to Inspire magazine which urged readers to attack Western countries by any means possible to cause death, fear and economic damage.
Metropolitan Police Deputy Assistant Commissioner Stuart Osborne said the counter terrorism operation was “one of the most significant and complex” of recent years, and involved 1,000 police officers and staff at its height.
“We had a network of highly dangerous men based in three cities who were working together to plan terrorist attacks in the UK.
“Had we not taken action to disrupt this network, their actions could have resulted in serious casualties or fatalities,” he added.
Nine men who plotted to bomb the London Stock Exchange and build a terrorist training camp have been jailed.
Three of the men – all members of an al-Qaeda inspired terror group – received indeterminate sentences for public protection at London’s Woolwich Crown Court.
The court heard they had planned to raise funds for a terrorist camp in Pakistan and recruit Britons to attend.
The men come from Stoke-on-Trent, Cardiff and London.
The three to receive indeterminate sentences were Mohammed Shahjahan 27, of Stoke-on-Trent, who was jailed for a minimum term of eight years and 10 months.
Usman Khan, 20, and Nazam Hussain, 26, also from Stoke-on-Trent, were ordered to serve at least eight years.
Other sentences were:
All nine men were arrested in December 2010. Each pleaded guilty to terrorism charges on the eve of their trial at Woolwich Crown Court.



CROWDS watching the repatriations in Royal Wootton Bassett were among the possible targets of a gang who admitted plotting horriffic bomb attacks in London.
Four men pleaded guilty on Wednesday at Woolwich Crown Court in London to charges of preparing for acts of terrorism by planning to bomb the Stock Exchange.
And among their possible targets discovered by police and MI5 were the crowds in High Street watching the soldiers killed in action being brought home through the town, the court heard.
North Wiltshire MP James Gray said he was not surprised that the town was a possible target.
“I think terrorist groups of that kind probably have long target lists,” he said. “While it is obviously worrying, at the same time it is perhaps not surprising it was a very high target at the same time.
“The fact nothing happened is a tribute to our excellent security forces and the police. Thank goodness nothing ever happened.”
The gang, which was led by Mohammed Chowdhury, 21, of East London, also had Parliament, The London Eye, Westminster Abbey and the US Embassy on their list, the court heard.
The group, which also included Shah Rahman, 29, from East London, and brothers Abdul Miah, 25, and Gurukanth Desai, 30, both from Cardiff, had been due to face a five-month trial, but changed their pleas. Five other men who had been seen in secret talks with the four men by surveillance teams admitted lesser charges at court on Wednesday.
President of the Royal Wootton Bassett branch of the Royal British Legion, Maurice Baker, who was among the people who organised the repatriations, said he had not expected the town to be a target.
“Islam have always said that they would never interrupt a funeral anywhere, that is part of their religious beliefs,” he said.
“In hindsight if we realised there was a danger there we would have felt very apprehensive.”
Maurice said police and security forces always made careful checks of the area before repatriations took place.
“Every time we had a repatriation the police dogs searched everything and the drain covers were filled,” he said.
All nine men will be sentenced tomorrow.
The deranged muppets of Indymedia, in their quest to deny Patriots their freedom of speech and assembly are listing coach companies phone numbers and asking them to ring and harass. A nightmare for the poor girls in the offices trying to do their jobs to be bomabrded with idiotic calls about “nazis and fascists”.
This tactic is not only pathetic but also pointless and Ill tell you why. Next time one of our girls books a coach for a demo this is how the conversation will go.
Me: “Hi can I book a coach please?”
Coach employee: “Yes love where are you going?”
Me: (Depending on where demo is) “Alton Towers/Legoland/Blackpool/West Midland Safari Park” etc
Im sure you get the picture. These people are running a business, and they dont know who they are carrying and they dont really care. So waste your time ringing them if youve got nothing else in your life and it makes you feel better, but you wont slow us down one bit. You’ve tried it before and even companies whove told you they wont carry us again, have done. We just get a different person to ring. Easy peasy.
We are paying customers and weve never wrecked a bus yet. If Muslims attack the coach thats a matter for police and insurance companies, not us.
Becki NFSE
See link for their idiotic threats
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2012/02/491973.html?c=on#c278718
Exclusive by Richard Wheatstone
February 06, 2012
This is the face of an innocent teenager who could lose his sight after a gang of thugs stamped on his head in an unprovoked attack.
Trainee chef Daniel Stringer-Price, 17, was walking through Hyde town centre with best friend Kavan Brown when they were set upon.
Doctors at Manchester Royal Infirmary are now battling to repair severly damaged nerves in Daniel’s eyes. He also suffered a fractured skull, a fractured cheekbone, and two fractured eye sockets.
Now his mum Cheryl Stringer, of Woodstock Crescent, Stockport, hopes this harrowing picture of her son will help catch this attackers.
She said: “We hope that anyone who sees this picture will see how serious Daniel’s injuries are and if they have any information will take it straight to the police to help catch the people who did this.”
Daniel’s pal Kavan, 17, who suffered a broken nose in the attack, told how the gang appeared to pick them out at random as they walked past a takeaway in Nelson Street.
Kavan said a man inside the shop waved a knife at them and gestured that he was going to cut their throats. The gang of about 10 men then chased them as they fled towards a relative’s house. They were savagely beaten as they tried to get inside.
Kavan, who has lived on the same street as Daniel and his family since childhood, said: “I just can’t understand why it happened.
“I’d never seen any of them in my life before but they seemed to pick us out as we walked down the street.
“They split us up and we each had five of them attacking us, it was horrific.
“When they ran off, I saw Daniel on the floor, he was conscious but in a really bad way. I’m still in shock at what happened to me but it’s even more horrendous to see your best mate in the state he’s in and now we’re all just praying he’ll be okay.”
Police are appealing for witnesses to the attack, at 10.20pm on Saturday. The man in the takeaway is described as Asian, in his early to mid 20s and wearing dark clothing. The rest of the gang were all Asian and wearing hooded tops and scarves over their faces.
A police spokesman said inquiries are ongoing.
Anyone with information should call the non-emergency number, 101, or Crimestoppers, anonymously, on 0800 555 111.
Over 1000 EDL attended todays march and demo and apart from what is happening at the moment, young Muslims (as is usual) running around trying to attack stragglers, there has been no trouble and no arrests. Martin Smith is tweeting some ridiculous bullshit. His crediblity is zero. Even the local biased press said 700 EDL and 200 UAF yet Martin makes it up as he goes along.
Spoke to EDL support team earlier and was informed that a return date to Leicester for a further demo is being discussed at next meeting.
Becki xx
Police and Commie reporters saying 500-700 EDL Suzy and Roxy say well over 1000 possibly around 1200 in total. 50 Casuals refusing to be kettled are roaming unhindered. They say less that 50 on UAF march. Police say 200 unwashed.