Yes the Judge often calls white thugs “model citizens” pffftttt #edl #leftwingjudges

‘Model citizens’ locked up for vicious beating of innocent teacher

10:00am Sunday 26th August 2012 in News

TWO previously ‘model’ citizens who turned attackers and subjected an innocent teacher to a ferocious beating are behind bars.

Burnley Crown Court heard how victim Junaid Hussain, 22, had been lured to a house in Nelson by his old school friend Zahoor Hussain.

Whilst he was there, Mohammed Owais, 23, came in and set about the victim with a metal bar, bit his right cheek, punched him in the face and headbutted him.

Zahoor Hussain then joined in the violence and stamped on his head.

The victim suffered swelling to his eye and cheekbone, a bite mark, a mark on his forehead, and a bust lip and when police arrived they found him with his jumper covered in blood.

Zahoor Hussain, 23, of Hibson Road, and Owais, of Railway Street, both Nelson, who have both been to university, had earlier admitted wounding, committed on May 19, last year.

Owais, who alleged the victim had ‘bad mouthed’ him, was jailed for nine months. Hussain received a 19 week prison sentence.

For Owais, Simon Gurney told the court he was well educated and had prospects for the future.

He worked in a retail outlet and his income went to support his family.

The barrister said: “It would have a significant impact on his family also if he was sent to custody today. The court could have every confidence if a suspended sentence was passed today, that the defendant would not trouble the courts again.”

Ads by Google

• Lawyers

  Expert, Client-Focused Services. Need Professional Legal Advice?

  huttons-solicitors.co.uk

• Lose 4 Stone in 3 Months?

  Discover the Shocking Truth About Britain’s Hottest Diet…

  TrimRecipe.com/Diet

Mr Gurney said: “For 15 months he has had the case hanging over him and it has had a salutary effect upon him.”

Anthony Rose, representing Hussain, said the defendants were decent young men, who were involved in the community and wanted to help people.

Mr Rose said: “I accept that it was his instigation that got the victim round to the house.”

Sentencing, Recorder Terence Rigby said neither of the defendants had any previous convictions.

He told the pair: “You were both young men for whom the world was waiting. You were, to a degree, a model within your own community, both of you.”

http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/news/9894066._Model_citizens__locked_up_for_vicious_beating_of_innocent_teacher/

Carlisle sentences – we are under attack like never before

Use link at the bottom of this article to see the video of a supposed “terrifying” attack on a takeaway by people who believed the staff were involved in grooming young girls. (Most of them are – In Blackpool police said out of 23 takeaways 17 were involved in grooming girls) Apart from two of the men in this video, Andrew Ryan and the one who tips a chair over, most of the people involved are guilty of no more than a Section 5 public order offence and some as low as Drunk and Disorderly, a pathetic offence.

Yet because of the massive onslaught against white people by a legal system obsessed with political correctness, they were all jailed, including women with no previous and all for lengthy terms just because they dared abuse immigrants. The Muslim who killed someone in Dewsbury a few weeks ago had less prison than some of these girls have had for shouting, is that right? The four Somali girls in Leicester who kicked Rhea Pages head in had six months SUSPENDED, yet these girls who hit nobody got twelve months INSIDE. Is that fair?

Senior police, the Ministry of Justice, the CPS and Judges are all obsessed with diversity and with smashing white people down at any opportunity they get. Nearly 5000 white people were prosecuted for “hate crimes” last year according to the MOJ, most of them involving name calling, and most, you can bet involving jail sentences. Emma West and other women are being witch hunted for speaking their mind on trains.Again, likely to be jailed for offensive words, while immigrants attack our people and walk free. Police are launching major investigations about people chanting “Youre not English anymore” at Notts Forest and calling it “racist”. Quite clearly we are being persecuted for “thought crime”.

Massive amounts of money and hassle surround British football witchhunts as our players are constantly attacked as “racist” and  John Terry is dropped from his position before even being found guilty of an offence. The murder of Stephen Lawrence is rammed down our throats every day, as if to remind us that as white people we ought to be ashamed of our racist selves.

These politically correct morons are building up a major problem for this country as the more and more you persecute your own people and treat them as racist, the more of them will build up resentment and anger and become “racist”. The rise of all these patriotic groups is and the trouble occurring up and down the country is an early indicator of much bigger problems ahead. As the old saying goes “If you treat people like scum, some of them start acting like scum” and its already happening. These people are massively concerned about appeasing minorities in the interest of “community cohesion”, failing to see that the biggest part of the community is becoming increasingly alienated and hostile. If the people in the Carlisle case werent hardcore racists before they were imprisoned, they surely will be when they come out.

We are still the majority in this country and constantly persecuting us and telling us we are racist  while ignoring our concerns will eventually lead to big problems.

Suzy NFSE

 

Click below for Carlisle case details and video of “attack” involving no violence for which ALL of them were jailed

http://casualsunited.wordpress.com/2012/02/10/carlisle-eleven-jailed-ridiculous-sentences-for-minor-public-order-offences/

Click below for Rhea Page attack involving massive violence for which NONE of them were jailed

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2070562/Muslim-girl-gang-kicked-Rhea-Page-head-yelling-kill-white-slag-FREED.html

The anti British BBC protecting those that want to murder us

BBC journalists have been told not to call hate preacher Abu Qatada an ‘extremist’.

Using such a term to describe the man once called ‘Osama bin Laden’s right-hand man in Europe’, is making a ‘value judgment’ and should be avoided, bosses have said.

The corporation’s managers have insisted he should be described as ‘radical’, according to meeting notes seen by the Telegraph.

Journalists were also advised not to use images that suggest the preacher is overweight, the paper says.

Dangerous: BBC bosses have discouraged staff from describing Abu Qatada as an extremist. They have also been told to avoid using pictures of him in which he looks fat

Earlier this week an immigration judge ruled that the Muslim preacher – who former Home Secretary David Blunkett described as ‘extraordinarily dangerous’ – should be released from jail.

Despite Home Secretary Theresa May’s insistence that ‘the right place for a terrorist is in a prison cell’, he is expected to walk free from Long Lartin high security prison in Worcestershire on Monday.

Even his defence team has suggested he poses a ‘grave risk’ to national security.

Despite this, BBC journalists were told they should avoided calling Qatada an extremist.

More…

• Hate preacher Hamza could be set free after bail ruling on fanatic Abu Qatada

 

The guidance was issued at the BBC newsroom’s 9.00am editorial meeting yesterday, chaired by a senior manager, Andrew Roy.

According to notes of the meeting, seen by The Daily Telegraph, journalists were told: ‘Do not call him an extremist – we must call him a radical. Extremist implies a value judgment.’

The guidance has been met with criticism from MPs and experts.

Maajid Nawaz of counter-extremist think-tank Quilliam, says the BBC has ‘liberal paralysis’ over Islamic extremism, adding that journalists have to be honest about Qatada’s record.

He told Mail Online: ‘A radical is someone who is different from the norm. An extremist is someone who promotes extreme views and actions, like killing innocents.’

BBC journalists were told that they should avoid making ‘value judgments’ when describing the radical preacher

Conservative MP James Clappison, a member of the Home Affairs Select Committee, said: ‘Given the evidence about this man, it makes you wonder what you have to do for the BBC to call you an extremist.’

BBC staff were also advised not to use library images that show the cleric looking overweight, because he has ‘lost a lot of weight’.

A BBC spokesman told Mail Online: ‘It is not uncommon for us to discuss how we cover stories impartially and we always think very carefully about the language we use.

‘We do not ban words -  the notes are a reflection of a live editorial discussion about how to report the latest developments on this story.

‘In terms of pictures, as with any story, this is a reminder to use the most up-to-date photos for accuracy.’

The guidance comes after the BBC warned journalists to try to avoid using the word ‘terrorist’ after the July 7 bombings in 2005.

In an advisory memo sent to all BBC journalists, the Corporation said that ‘terrorist’ is politically loaded and should be used only ‘sparingly’.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2098129/BBC-tells-journalists-avoid-calling-Abu-Qatada-extremist.html#ixzz1lnNvCPsN