Inside the CPS #edl #ukip #woolwich

As we have said many times, the Crown Prosecution Service is not fit for purpose and needs to be scrapped. They are obsessed with “diversity” and will spare no expense at prosecuting white people for even minor criticism of Islam or immigration. How much did this bullshit case cost?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/merseyside/8404212.stm

The Liverpool hoteliers who were dragged through court for disagreeing with a Muslim woman. Its disgusting that the police even bothered arresting them for such a pathetic complaint but even more disgusting that some “pc” moron in the CPS thought there was a realistic prospect of a conviction. If the judge had not seen sense they may be in prison now, and for what?

The zeal they have for prosecuting racial cases does not apply when the suspect is ethnic.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1270021/British-Muslim-daubs-war-memorial-Islamic-slogans–CPS-says-NOT-racially-motivated.html

If that graffiti was not racially motivated what is?

Meanwhile Emma West is remanded in custody for having a drunken rant on a train, and the CPS are going after her with a vengeance, but then shes white, so shes fair game.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-16051120

The CPS failed to prosecute the Leicester Somalis who viciously assaulted a white woman while shouting “kill the white slag”, why?

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/features/3990071/I-darent-go-out-since-race-attack.html

We get an insight from an email we recieved from an ex employee of the CPS

“Under the direction of the “Director of Diversity” it was decided they could earn brownie points by downgrading all the senior caseworker posts and making them junior posts. Ostensibly this was to cut the wage bill. It also had the effect of getting rid of all part-timers and anybody with a family friendly work pattern. The Family friendly policy was SO last year! Nearly 1000 of us went in the department in the course of a year.  But it had the secondary effect of ridding the department of experienced, mature staff, who were mostly white, because we had been there since the 80s and the junior replacements were recruited with ‘diversity’ criteria in mind. I had got used to not hearing English spoken around me on the tube – during this period I started to find the same thing in the office lift and canteen queue”

The above cases and this from an ex employee PROVE that the CPS has become a politically correct organisation who are clearly not interested in prosecuting anyone for racial offences other than white people. It should be scrapped. End of.

One law for all

Suzy

Good move, taking the power away from the corrupt CPS. We’ve said this for years #edl #ukip

Crime victims offered right of review of charging decisions

Victims of crime will be able to ask prosecutors to review a case

Continue reading the main story

Related Stories

• Legal aid plans ‘remove choice’
• Charity criticises crime victim code
• Keir Starmer stepping down as DPP

Victims of crime in England and Wales are being given the right to challenge decisions to stop prosecutions or not charge suspects.

The victims’ right to review covers any decision by the Crown Prosecution Service not to pursue a case.

Director of public prosecutions Keir Starmer said victims had been treated as “bystanders” in the past.

Mr Starmer said the move could affect about 70,000 cases a year, but would not cover those dropped by the police.

Ministers and campaigners say it will improve the way the justice system dealt with victims.

BBC home affairs correspondent Danny Shaw said the CPS was confident it would not open the floodgates to tens of thousands of victims clogging up the system with appeals and delaying other prosecutions.

Court ruling

The new policy, which is in effect now, follows a 2011 Court of Appeal ruling which stated that “as a decision not to prosecute is in reality a final decision for a victim, there must be a right to seek review of such a decision”.

The ruling referred to the case of Christopher Killick, who was jailed for three-and-a-half years for violent sexual attacks on two people who, like him, had cerebral palsy.

Continue reading the main story

Analysis

Danny ShawHome affairs correspondent, BBC News

Times are changing for victims.

Thirty years ago, the DPP’s policy was that charging decisions “should not remain open for reappraisal and possible reversal”.

That was amended after the CPS was established in 1986 to allow prosecutions to be brought where they had previously been ruled out in “exceptional” circumstances.

Later the CPS made clear that decisions could be overturned if they were found to be “wrong”.

But the latest policy goes far further: it charts an official route for victims to contest charging decisions.

Could it open the floodgates at Rose Court, CPS HQ, to tens of thousands of victims, clogging up the system with appeals and delaying other prosecutions?

Keir Starmer doesn’t think so.

But it is an ambitious plan – and will need careful monitoring to ensure it works.

Killick was tried and convicted only when one of his victims complained to the CPS, prompting prosecutors to reverse their earlier decision not to press charges.

Announcing the proposals, Mr Starmer said: “The criminal justice system historically treated victims as bystanders and accordingly gave them little say in their cases.”

He said this approach was supposed to inspire confidence in decisions that, once made, were final.

“But in reality it had the opposite effect,” he said. “Refusing to admit mistakes can seriously undermine public trust in the criminal justice system.”

‘Reasonable chance’

Mr Starmer said the CPS currently received about 1,600 complaints per year and he expected the number of review requests to be more than that.

But he said the figure was unlikely to be “anything like” the full 70,000 cases not pursued.

The CPS currently pursues cases where its staff believe there is a “reasonable chance” of a conviction, and the same test will apply when reviewing cases.

Mr Starmer said he expected the original decision to be correct in the “vast majority” of cases.

“There’s no right to charge,” he said. “Nobody has that, nor should they.

“If the right decision was made then it has to be upheld.”

Mr Starmer said mistakes were inevitable in a justice system which deals with 800,000 defendants a year.

A CPS spokesman said reviews would be carried out by a different lawyer in the same region where the original decision was made, but if the decision not to pursue a case was upheld it would then be examined at CPS headquarters as well.

The new procedure will only apply to decisions made from now on.

Strengthen rights

Prosecutors press charges only if there is enough evidence for a realistic chance of conviction and when doing so is in the public interest.

Now victims of crime will be able to ask the CPS to review a case if there is a decision not to bring charges, to discontinue proceedings or to offer no evidence.

Charity Victim Support welcomed the move, saying it would strengthen victims’ rights and “help to reposition victims back at the heart of our justice system”.

Chief executive Javed Khan added: “Too often victims tell us that they don’t have much of a voice in our justice system.”

Helen Grant, Minister for Victims and the Courts, said: “If a victim has the strength to come forward, it is right that we give them every possible chance to get the justice they so deserve.”

The CPS is launching a public consultation on its new policy, to see how it works in practice.

http://casualsunited.wordpress.com/2013/04/29/inside-the-crown-prosecution-service-edl-brighton-cps-southeastalliance-mfe/

The consultation will last for three months, after which the CPS will decide whether any alterations are needed, a spokesman explained.

Anyone wondering why a gang of Somalis kicking a white girl half to death is not racist but an argument in a kebab house is, heres your answer #edl #uaf

02/11/2012

Award win for National Black Crown Prosecution Association

The National Black Crown Prosecution Association (NBCPA) has been awarded public sector employee network of the year in the Race for Opportunity Awards 2012.

The awards celebrate public and private sector organisations committed to equality, diversity and inclusion that are demonstrating tangible results in the area.

The NBCPA, which brings together Black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) staff at the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), was recognised for its impact on both CPS employment and prosecution practice.

The association has contributed to the development of prosecution and HR policies, equality objectives, equality impact assessments and learning materials. It has also played an important role in helping the CPS strengthen its pool of talented BAME staff.

In addition to its work within the CPS, the NBCPA also supports community engagement with diverse communities, delivering mentoring programmes with other members of the Criminal Justice System.

Dale Simon, Director of Equality and Diversity at the CPS, said:

“The NBCPA plays an important role in promoting equality and diversity throughout the CPS and the wider criminal justice system. This award recognises the positive impact the association has not only through the development and support of its members but also on the CPS in general.”

Adrian Joseph, Chair of Race for Opportunity, said:

“Race for Opportunity stands for diverse and inclusive senior leaders, building the talent pipeline, increasing BAME representation and progression in the workplace, and for the reduction of ethnic minority youth unemployment. This is not about philanthropy, it’s about sound business judgement, but never has our challenge been greater. I commend all the Race for Opportunity award winners for leading the way in unlocking this business opportunity and embedding diversity and inclusion into their long-term business planning and strategy.”

Background
Race for Opportunity is the race equality in the workplace campaign from Business in the Community. For more information please visit http://www.bitcdiversity.org.uk.

http://blog.cps.gov.uk/2012/11/award-win-for-national-black-crown-prosecution-association.html

More proof, if proof was needed, that the #CPS are not fit for purpose #edl

More proof that the #CPS is only interested in racially persecuting whites #edl

Photographer to the stars is cleared of race assault of

Muslim woman in supermarket

• Photographer Cinnamon Heathcote Drury cleared of calling a Muslim family ‘terrorists’
• Also accused of pushing pregnant woman wearing a hijab
• Heathcote Drury denied racially aggravated assault

By TOM KELLY

PUBLISHED: 00:43, 6 July 2012 | UPDATED: 00:44, 6 July 2012

• Comments (0)
• Share

Photographer Cinnamon Heathcote Drury, pictured leaving Isleworth Crown Court, was cleared of racially aggravated assault

A portrait photographer to the stars wept yesterday as she was cleared of pushing over a pregnant woman and calling her a terrorist in a supermarket row.

Cinnamon Heathcote-Drury had also been accused of calling the family of the hijab-wearing woman suicide bombers, and telling her: ‘I’m a British citizen. I don’t know where you came from.’

But a jury took only 15 minutes to acquit her of racially aggravated assault after hearing that the police investigation was a ‘shambles’.

And the prosecution accepted during the hearing that she was a ‘wonderful person’ who was ‘eloquent and well-spoken’ and not a racist.

Isleworth Crown Court heard she had offered to help mother-of-three Mounia Hamoumi, who was six months’ pregnant at the time, unload her shopping trolley after her husband refused to help because he was too busy looking after their children.

The confrontation began after her husband told Miss Heathcote-Drury to ‘get lost’ as they queued for the till at Tesco in Kensington, West London, in November.

Prosecutor Nermine Abdel Sayed said Miss Heathcote-Drury became ‘aggressive’, adding: ‘You used the words “suicide bomber” and “terrorist”.’

Miss Heathcote-Drury was also accused of saying: ‘You’re probably claiming jobseeker’s [allowance]‘, and of pushing Mrs Hamoumi to the floor.

 

Miss Heathcote-Drury denied pushing Mrs Hamoumi and using any racist language, saying that the comments attributed to her had been ‘made up’ and that she had been the victim of an assault.

She said she was told by the husband ‘You **** off’, before being tripped up by Mrs Hamoumi as she tried to walk away.

She also claimed Mrs Hamoumi kicked her in both shins, punched her and slammed her arm on a supermarket trolley.

On trial: Isleworth Crown Court had heard Heathcote Drury called a Muslim family ‘terrorists’

But police declined to pursue Miss Heathcote-Drury’s allegations of assault and charged her.

Her defence barrister told the court that the police investigation was a ‘shambles’ with no evidence of injuries on the alleged victim and no independent witnesses who saw the alleged shove.

The jury also heard that Miss Heathcote-Drury had repeatedly requested CCTV footage of the fracas from the store and the police.

But she was told by police five months after the incident that the footage did not show anything of significance for the case.

Outside court Miss Heathcote-Drury’s solicitor, Sarnjit Lal, said: ‘Miss Heathcote-Drury is relieved that her horrendous ordeal is over and delighted that the jury, having heard the evidence, took only 15 minutes to acquit her, which reflects the baseless nature of these allegations.’

Miss Heathcote-Drury has 11 portraits in the National Portrait Gallery of subjects including London Mayor Boris Johnson and BBC presenter Jeremy Paxman.

Speaking yesterday, she said: ‘It has been extremely tough to have this hanging over me for the past eight months. Naturally I am immensely relieved it is finally over.’

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2169510/Photographer-stars-cleared-race-assault-Muslim-woman-supermarket.html#ixzz1zosBN99y

How the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has become a tool for persecuting white people #edl #cps #royalcourtsofjustice

The CPS was formed in the 80s as a body, seperate from the police, to oversee prosecutions and make charging decisions. Prior to this the police would arrest, charge and prosecute. The massive amount of high profile stitch ups the police were involved in forced the need for an independent body to take over this role. For a few years they did their job very well. They worked on what was called the 51% rule where if there wasnt a 51% chance of a conviction, case would be dropped. This was saving the courts a lot of time and effort, and sifting out cases where it was obvious the evidence was weak, and police were prosecuting simply because they had it in for the person they’d arrested.

The lefties in the media were NOT happy with this and started a campaign of slating the CPS, calling them the Criminals Protection Society etc and bit by bit, the work they were doing started to be interfered with. The relationship with the police is so close on a day to day basis, that although they are supposed to be two independent bodies, in reality they are hand in glove, and cannot be independent.

According to my lecturer, in the 80s the CPS was seen as a “joke job” which legal professionals sneered at. It was low class, low status and badly paid. Any lawyer with any respect did not want to work there. The starting rate for a caseworker was £10,000 a year, which was poor.

Over the years, it has become riddled with left wingers, and they started to introduce “diversity training” and the like. An ex employee of London CPS told us what happened when they appointed a black woman, who was a member of the “Association of Black Lawyers” (ie a racist) as Diversity Manager.

 

 

We get an insight from an email we recieved from an ex employee of the CPS

“Under the direction of the “Director of Diversity” it was decided they could earn brownie points by downgrading all the senior caseworker posts and making them junior posts. Ostensibly this was to cut the wage bill. It also had the effect of getting rid of all part-timers and anybody with a family friendly work pattern. The Family friendly policy was SO last year! Nearly 1000 of us went in the department in the course of a year.  But it had the secondary effect of ridding the department of experienced, mature staff, who were mostly white, because we had been there since the 80s and the junior replacements were recruited with ‘diversity’ criteria in mind. I had got used to not hearing English spoken around me on the tube – during this period I started to find the same thing in the office lift and canteen queue”

Full article here:

http://casualsunited.wordpress.com/2011/12/11/inside-the-crown-prosecution-service/

So the old school white civil servants who would do their job to the letter, were systematically replaced by a mixture of foreigners, and white Marxist/Lefty/Liberals, as if you went for an interview, unless you spouted about diversity and political correctness, you werent getting the job.

When you are arrested, you are told the arresting officers are liasing with the CPS, yet you are never given a contact name at the CPS, and you never know who is persecuting you behind the scenes. The CPS, despite being the ones who decide your fate, are faceless and they are NOT ACCOUNTABLE. This means, if you were jailed for something it was later discovered you did not do, what happens? You sue the police and if you are compensated, its from the police and if anyone is punished it is the officers who dealt with you. Have you ever heard of the CPS ending up in trouble in ANY high profile miscarriage of justice case?

If you look at previous posts on this blog its now clear, that as well as the CPS being infested with Marxists, many of the top posts are filled by Muslims. Some of whom have been done for corruption.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1294918/Jailed-Former-Court-official-took-20k-bribe-wealthy-businessman-drop-assault-charge.html

Is it any wonder then that we find ourselves in a position where time and time again, white people are having the book thrown at them and are seen as fair game, yet violent immigrants are often charged with lesser offences than they should be, and are NEVER charged with racial aggravation.

Those who burned poppies on Remembrance day were only charged with a Section 5 and fined £50 for insulting the whole nation. The Somalis who nearly killed Rhea Page in Leicester while shouting “kill the white bitch” were not charged with racial aggravation. This guy who sprayed up a war memorial was not charged with racial aggravation.

http://casualsunited.wordpress.com/2012/06/27/more-proof-if-you-needed-it-of-how-hate-laws-are-only-used-against-white-by-corrupt-cps-edl/

Also, the CPS have had a large part to play in the covering up of the epedemic of Muslim grooming gangs. The Rochdale case they allowed the gang to carry on for another 3 years with countless victims, as they did not want to prosecute as they knew it would show muslims in a bad light.

http://casualsunited.wordpress.com/2012/06/27/police-and-cps-allowed-a-gang-to-carry-on-raping-children-for-three-years-as-they-didnt-want-to-be-called-racist-edl/

In Blackpool they STILL have not arrested the gangs responsible for grooming over 60 girls and police admitted it was covered up for fear of racism accusations.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1374443/Police-hid-abuse-60-girls-Asian-takeaway-workers-linked-Charlene-Downes-murder.html

The same CPS which botched the Charlene Downes murder trial, has just thrown all it has at getting the Brierfield 12 sent down, and we are told that the Muslim gang who attacked them on the day and caused the whole situation may have charges dropped as CPS have messed up the evidence. How convenient.

The CPS is not fit for purpose and has become a tool for silencing white people. Every day it pisses more and more people off. All the people who constantly rattle on about “racism” are part of a system which is happily racially persecuting the white people of the country. This is the real racism.

Becki

More proof (if you needed it) of how “hate laws” are only used against whites by corrupt #CPS #edl

Muslim daubs war memorial with ‘Islam will dominate

the world’ – but walks free after CPS says he was NOT

racially motivated

By JAMES TOZER
UPDATED: 23:30, 30 April 2010

• Comments (405)
• Share

A Muslim protester who daubed a war memorial with graffiti glorifying Osama Bin Laden and proclaiming ‘Islam will dominate the world’ walked free from court after prosecutors ruled his actions were not motivated by religion.

Tohseef Shah, 21, could have faced a tougher sentence if the court had accepted that the insults  -  which included a threat to kill the Prime Minister  -  were inspired by religious hatred.

But  -  citing a loophole in the law  -  the Crown Prosecution Service chose not to charge him with that offence and he escaped with only a two-year conditional discharge and an order to pay the council £500 compensation after admitting causing criminal damage.

Yesterday the decision was attacked by politicians and veterans who were shocked by the desecration of the memorial in Burton-upon-Trent, Staffordshire.

Islamic message: Tohseef Shah’s graffiti ‘Islam will dominate the world’ was not religiously motivated, according to the Crown Prosecution Service

Conservative MP Patrick Mercer, chairman of the Parliamentary Counter Terrorism sub-committee, said: ‘This is an outrage against our war dead.’

Shah sprayed the words ‘Islam will dominate the world  -  Osama
is on his way’ and ‘Kill Gordon Brown‘ on the plinth of the memorial in December.

He was arrested after his DNA was found on the discarded spray-can but refused to give an explanation for his actions or show any remorse, a court heard.

A file was sent to lawyers at the Counter Terrorism Division of the CPS in London to see if there was a racially or religiously motivated connotation.

However when Shah appeared before magistrates this week, prosecutor Andrew Bodger said: ‘It was decided there was not enough evidence to prove this, and they decided it was politically motivated.’

Unrepentant: the court heard that Mr Shah had shown ‘no remorse’

Defending, Mumtaz Chaudry said Shah did not hold extremist views. ‘This is nothing to do with his religious beliefs, his family’s beliefs or his cultural beliefs,’ he said. ‘He is just an ordinary guy.

‘He is remorseful, but at the time of his interview he was simply answering questions and didn’t realise that was the right time to show remorse.’

Local veterans reacted with horror last night. Roy Whenman, 78, who fought in the Korean War, said: ‘If what he wrote on the memorial wasn’t evidence of racial or religious hatred then what is?

‘The memorial commemorates people of my generation who died for our freedom as well as those fighting in wars today.

‘It’s diabolical that someone could deface it in this way.’

Community leaders among Burton- upon-Trent’s 4,000-strong Muslim population also slammed Shah’s actions.

Khadim Thathall, a former president of a mosque in the town, said: ‘This young man has clearly been radicalised by groups which are looking to cause trouble and it’s a pity that the court hasn’t been able to dealwith him more strictly.’

Shah  -  believed to be a former student of De Montfort University in Leicester  -  uses as his Facebook profile photograph a flaming lion’s head superimposed on crossed Kalashnikov rifles.

He lives with his parents in a £200,000 detached house and works at his father’s car spares shop. Last night, he refused to discuss the case.

Instead he appointed Abdullah Ibn Abbas, who described himself as spiritual leader of a group called Road to Jannah, to speak on his behalf.

He said: ‘It really doesn’t concern us how the British people feel about the graffiti he wrote  -  the real outrage should be about the thousands of Muslims who are being killed and butchered as a result of British foreign policy.’

The CPS said Shah’s offence could not be charged as a hate crime because the law requires that damage must target a particular religious or racial group.

It said: ‘While it was appreciated that what was sprayed on the memorial may have been perceived by some to be part of a racial or religious incident, no racial or religious group can be shown to have been targeted.’

The case comes after a senior judge ruled on Thursday that Christian beliefs had no right to protection by the courts.

Lord Justice Laws told Christian counsellor Gary McFarlane he had no right to appeal after he was sacked for refusing to give sex therapy to a gay couple.

The judge said legal protection for views held purely on religious grounds would be ‘irrational’.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1270021/British-Muslim-daubs-war-memorial-Islamic-slogans–CPS-says-NOT-racially-motivated.html#ixzz1z01yMnq1

The shape of “Justice” in Britain today – whites jailed for words, immigrants who assault walk free #edl

Which is the more serious offence do you think? Being drunk on a train and shouting some mild racial abuse or trying to kick someone to death while calling them a “white slag”? Well in today’s Britain, the shouting abuse offence is the one that gets treated most harshly. Our legal system is geared towards throwing the book at white people who dare question the mass invasion of our country by immigrants, many of whom are here only to abuse our benefits system, and many who have out and out hatred for us and cant even be bothered to try and disguise it.

Today the woman in the clip here http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-18251807 who racially abused a few people (who are apparantly taking the piss out of her) was jailed for 5 months. She had done the same thing once before but the reality of the matter is, what she is guilty of here is a Section 5 public order offence, which should get her an £80 spot fine. Instead because it is “racially aggravated” she is jailed. 11 people were jailed recently in Carlisle for the same sort of thing, where no violence was used, just insulting/racist words. The police, CPS and Judges are DESPERATE to show their “anti racist” credentials, and will lock up any racist person that finds themselves at their mercy.

At the same time, the police, CPS and Judges also want to show how “not racist” they are by being leniant on any immigrants that appear before them. The vicious racist attack on Rhea Page in Leicester is a prime example of this, story here http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2070562/Muslim-girl-gang-kicked-Rhea-Page-head-yelling-kill-white-slag-FREED.html

The judge in the Aldershot case was the same, gave these hooligans a slap on the wrist and even seemed to be making excuses for their behaviour. Story here. http://casualsunited.wordpress.com/tag/aldershot-race-attack/

Weve said many times that the CPS is obsessed with diversity, and prosecutes white people ferociously while letting cases involving immigrant crimes such as grooming be swept under the carpet in the interests of “community cohesion”.

http://casualsunited.wordpress.com/2011/12/11/inside-the-crown-prosecution-service/

http://casualsunited.wordpress.com/2012/01/25/do-you-want-any-more-proof-that-football-fans-are-seen-as-fair-game-for-malicious-left-wingers-in-the-cps/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1374443/Police-hid-abuse-60-girls-Asian-takeaway-workers-linked-Charlene-Downes-murder.html

You see, to the police and CPS, white working class people and football fans are seen as “fair game”, but cases like the link above, of Muslim grooming gangs, well that needs to be hidden, we dont want any trouble now do we?

The fact is that you do not help “community cohesion” by constantly persecuting and unfairly treating white people as they are still the majority in this country and the day is coming when there will be a massive backlash against this persecution. Do you think this women is going to be “cured” by her 5 months in prison for a minor public order offence? No likely, she is going to be bitter and evil about it for the rest of her life. When people are locked up for offensive words, while groomers and paedophiles are allowed free reign, and Somalis and other foreigners are allowed to carry out vicious attacks and walk away laughing, there will be no peace.

Suzy NFSE